|
The Franklin County DemocratThe truth for a change. |
Published by the Franklin County Democratic Central Committee Office: 6908 West Argent, Pasco, Washington US Mail: PO Box 4883, Pasco, Washington 99301 USA Email: news@franklincounty-dems.org |
| www.franklincounty-dems.org | Sunday September 05, 2010 | Weather at 13:07 PDT: |
NEWS
EDITORIAL
OPINION
|
[Format for my printer]
Bank bailouts for dummiesBy David Chassin, Tuesday September 30, 2008If a bank is big enough, and stupid enough, and the situation is dire enough that its bankruptcy will drag down the world economy if the government doesn't intervene, then the government should own the bank outright regardless of what happens. Let's suppose the hypothetical Bank of Bailout has $10 billion in cash asset and $90 billion in non-performing mortgage-based assets (soon to become bad mortgages) on the left side of their balance sheet. On the right side however, they have obligations of say $60 billion, so that the stock is worth $40 billion.
As a result of the crash of seriously over-valued real-estate, the fair market value of these bad mortgages drops below $50 billion, and the bank is at risk of being insolvent. The stock drops to zero and the bank needs to be liquidated to pay its obligations, forcing the quick sale of the mortgage-based assets, which drives the price of bad mortgage assets down further. Oh, and there's one less lender in town, which dries up the supply of credit businesses need to buy inventory and make payroll.
Bank of Bailout is now hurting because these undervalued non-performing assets are making it impossible for the bank to function as a bank. It can't make loans to people because it doesn't have any cash and nobody will loan it any money. Without that business it can't make any money at all and it's situation gets ever worse.
Now Bank of Bailout goes to see Henry "Deep Pockets" Paulson, saying that if he doesn't help now, they will take the US economy down with them. Henry Paulson blinks at this bluff, and proposes to take these bad assets at reduced price, hopefully less than what their worth some years down the road, but certainly more than the market will pay for them now.
The price is a cool $700 billion. He reassures Congress, who is having serious apoplexy at this point, that maybe 15 or 20 years from now the government can make back its money and in the meantime, the bank is relieved of the burden of bad assets and can go back to the business of lending people other people's money, while abuse their credit card fees and taking people's homes, which is what makes our economy work smoothly.
No so fast says Congress!
Huh? Why not? Aahh, because if the government pays too much for the bad assets, then the stockholders will get free money from the taxpayer for having been stupid enough to trust the bozos they put in the bank's board room. But if the government pays too little, the bank goes under anyway and the expensive bailout fails to have the desired effect.
What's a Congressman to do?
The solution is simple. Make the bank's stock goes to zero by decree--all of it. No preferred shares. The government takes complete ownership of the bank until such time as a buyer for new stock in found. In the meantime, the bad assets are picked up by the government, the bank is put back on its feet and then sold to public for some fraction of the price paid for the bad assets. Later, the government can repackage the bad assets and resell them, once the real estate market recovers.
Seems simple enough.
And if you didn't notice, the Republican policies of unmitigated deregulation and cozy relationships between the Federal Reserve, the Securities Exchange Commission, the Treasury, and the big Wall Street banks results in the large nationalization in world history. It was this relationship that permitted the bank to have on $10 billion is asset while racking up $60 billion in liabilities.
And why do you think Paulson is so upset by Congress's resistance?
He's a former Wall Street bank CEO and his pride and joys are about to become the property of the government he despises so much.
It's really hard to feel sorry for him. Send us your comments to Reader's Letters |
Featured LinksPresident Obama's 2010 State of the Union Address |
| http://www.franklincounty-dems.org/news/?33 | 11 - 56 - 157 - 883 - 1793 | Copyright © 2010 Franklin County Democratic Central Committee |