|
The Franklin County DemocratThe truth for a change. |
Published by the Franklin County Democratic Central Committee Office: 6908 West Argent, Pasco, Washington US Mail: PO Box 4883, Pasco, Washington 99301 USA Email: news@franklincounty-dems.org |
| www.franklincounty-dems.org | Sunday September 05, 2010 | Weather at 13:32 PDT: |
NEWS
EDITORIAL
OPINION
|
[Format for my printer]
New Yorker endorses ObamaBy David Chassin, Tuesday October 07, 2008This is only the second time the New Yorker has endorsed a presidential candidate, and the last time was in 2004 when they endorsed John Kerry. The New Yorker gives an eloquent examination of the reasons for its support of Barack Obama, while delivering a scathing rebuke of the Bush administration and a harsh critique of McCain's support for what they term "the Republican disaster".
The wide-ranging analysis covers all the major issues and sides with Obama on every point, starting with the national debt, which the Bush administration drove past $10 trillion with the support of a Republican Congress, including John McCain. Touching on job creation, the surge in poverty, and the shift of the tax burden from the rich to middle class, the last eight years are compared very unfavorably with the previous eight years.
The Iraqi quagmire is laid squarely at the feet of Bush for it was he who lied, bullied, and manipulated the public into supporting this war, only so he could mismanaged it in every important respect, not to mention to cost to the taxpayers.
But granting that McCain is not Bush, the New Yorker nonetheless skewers the Republican candidate for his rightward shift, abandoning immigration reform, dumping his opposition to Bush tax cuts and voting for torture to build support from the religious right. McCain's mindless support for deregulation, on the other hand, has come home to roost, and they criticize his late-breaking support of financial reregulation.
The contrast with Obama is sharp and the New Yorker makes no bones about how significant it was in their consideration. They support his pay-as-you-go approach to budgeting, coupled with strong enforcement and oversight. They also support Obama's approach to climate change, energy, and most significantly judicial appointments.
In the New Yorker's opinion, Obama is "better suited for the task of renewing the bedrock foundation of American influence." They expect a transformation in foreign affairs by restoration of American credibility and moral leadership.
But in their opinion, it is the character of these men that most distinguishes them. While Obama is a genuine agent of change, McCain speaks the language of change while he disavows those very principles for which he once stood in opposition to his own party. While Obama's principles are well aligned with those of his party, McCain's were distinctly not and he had to change his views in order to get the support he needed to even have a chance of winning. Nothing more exemplifies the irony of McCain's situation and the cynicism of his approach as his choice of Sarah Palin as his running-mate. Given McCain age, the New Yorker characterizes this choice as "an act of breathtaking heedlessness and irresponsibility".
The New Yorker closes with a call for "a leader tempermentally, intellectually, and emotionally attuned to the complexities of our troubled globe" closing with "that leader's name is Barack Obama."
See //www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2008/10/13/081013taco_talk_editors for the full text of the New Yorker endorsement. Send us your comments to Reader's Letters |
Featured LinksPresident Obama's 2010 State of the Union Address |
| http://www.franklincounty-dems.org/news/?36 | 12 - 57 - 158 - 884 - 1794 | Copyright © 2010 Franklin County Democratic Central Committee |